Adult Fiction · History

Banned Books Week: Pamela

Pamela Samuel Richardson coverPamela, or Virtue Rewarded is a novel from 1740 written by Samuel Richardson, and the subject of my undergrad thesis. I’m studying its cultural impact. Pamela doesn’t stir up much controversy now, it’s not generally assigned to anyone to read, but when it was first published it was a pretty big deal! A debate raged over the appropriate content of reading matter, and indeed over whether reading was an acceptable pursuit at all. Pamela was quickly placed on the Pope’s Index of Forbidden Books, but that didn’t stop all and sundry from reading it.

Pamela is the story of the titular young servant fending off her employer’s sexual advances, until eventually he’s won over by her titular virtue and reforms his rakish ways, whereupon she agrees to marry him. It’s remarkably graphic, for what I was expecting. Basically it’s one long content note for attempted rapes and slut-shaming — worse even than the modern incarnations of rapey romances, and about as explicit, just without a final consummation.

The book thus resembles Animal Farm, which I talked about yesterday, in that it does actually contain the alleged objectionable material. I personally prefer it to modern romances because at least the narrator doesn’t approve — Richardson actually intended the book to be something of a guidance manual for young ladies on how to behave appropriately under these sorts of advances. (Basically to refuse everything and shout to high heaven unless the gentleman actually makes an honest proposal.) Still, the book dealt with pre-existing conventions present in lowbrow sexy books already being published. Some critics devoted whole books of response to calling Richardson a pornographer and lambasting Pamela for protesting too much, thus CLEARLY revealing herself to be a scheming slut. It’s awful.

First, books shouldn’t be banned for sexual content either, just be reasonably restricted by age range. But most importantly, the sex was never the point at all. Go back to Dr. Hutchings’ thesis from the talk on Tuesday… It’s never about what it’s actually about. Go back to that question he asked: “Who is trying to keep what out of the hands of whom, for what reason?”

The reason Pamela was a big deal, and the reason I’m writing a 20-page history thesis about it, is that the public related to this novel in a whole new way. It was about a lower-class woman, written as if it were a compilation of letters she had written to her parents in distress. People who read this book felt along with Pamela. Both men and women were astonished at the magic Richardson was working, to make each of them feel like a young servant woman suffering improper advances. They listened to her heartache, they recognized that real people did suffer similar distress, and they heard Pamela’s explicit arguments that her soul was worth just as much as anyone else’s. This book helped blow the dam open, and turned novels into the mass media items they are today. It’s been argued that the development of the novel established the most important precursor to human rights laws: The recognition that other people have inner lives like yours. That’s what people were trying to ban.

This novel is never assigned reading, but maybe it should be.

Advertisements

15 thoughts on “Banned Books Week: Pamela

  1. I’ve never read “Pamela,” but I read his other famous novel, “Clarissa.” It sounds like the flip side of the same idea. Clarissa is ENDLESSLY pursued by a rake who wants to have sex with her mainly because she doesn’t want to have sex with him. He has no intention of marrying her. He ends up raping her and she spends hundreds of pages gradually dying because of it It’s a really, really long novel (over 1000 pages) and when I was assigned it to read, I groaned. I thought it would be awful. It was better than I thought it would be, though, because of the astute psychological insights of the author.

    Like

      1. I was assigned it as part of my reading list for my Ph.D. in English. I specialized in novels.

        I don’t think it is widely assigned, except for people who are seriously studying the origin of the novel in English.

        Like

      1. Greetings, I am the author;s sixth great grandson, I am currently trying to get his headstone fixed up at St Bride’s Church Fleet Street , London. A couple of sayings were from him,Love will draw an elephant through a key-hole
        A good man, though he will value his own countrymen, yet will think as highly of the worthy men of every nation under the sun
        There are further 4 Author connections in the family, the family have interesting family ties with an academy award winner, my 4th great grand father was a friend of Charles Dickens, he signed his last will and testament as well, he was often at our family house in London. I am willing to give facts to anyone researching at deeper levels if required

        Like

Chit-chat

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s